‘A matter of time’ before text sender held responsible in distracted driving crash, lawyer says


    Before you hit ship in your subsequent text message, you may wish to be sure that the individual on the opposite finish is not driving.

    The warning, from a Toronto lawyer, comes in anticipation that the sender of a text that results in a collision might sooner or later be held responsible for accidents to a 3rd celebration.

    “It is a matter of time,” mentioned Jordan Solway, the group normal counsel and vice chairman of declare with Vacationers Canada

    Solway factors to a 2009 incident in New Jersey, in which an 18-year-old driver drifted into an oncoming lane and plowed head-on into a bike.

    The 2 riders on the bike suffered critical accidents and had their legs amputated. They sued the driving force and his girlfriend, who was texting him on the time of the crash.

    In 2013, a state court docket decided the driving force was responsible in the incident, however the sender was not.

    “They discovered that there was inadequate proof to show that the sender knew the operator was reviewing the text whereas driving,” Solway mentioned in an interview with Metro Morning.

    Lawyer Jordan Solway mentioned many drivers ‘merely don’t wish to miss one thing necessary’ whereas on the street. (LinkedIn)

    Nonetheless, Solways says, the court docket established the notion {that a} sender may very well be held responsible in an identical case if there may be stronger proof the sender knew the driving force was behind the wheel.

    “If you realize you are interfering with somebody’s operation of a car, there’s actually no distinction whether or not you are sitting in the passenger seat doing that or sitting at dwelling sending the text,” he mentioned.

    With that responsibility now established, Solway believes an identical customary will quickly arrive in Canada, although up to now no related instances have been tried.

    Altering attitudes

    Solway says a change in Canadian legislation would replicate rising considerations about distracted driving, which is now the main trigger of dying on the street.

    Lowering these fatalities might require an identical method to drunk driving legal guidelines launched over the earlier a long time, he mentioned.

    “Twenty years in the past, the notion of holding a restaurant or tavern responsible for over-serving any individual who will get in a automotive and causes an accident was comparatively novel,” Solway mentioned.

    “Now we take it as trite that you’ve that obligation.”

    Together with a change to legislation, Solway says there’s extra work to do to verify drivers do not choose up their telephones on the street.

    A latest research carried out by Vacationers Canada discovered that greater than a 3rd of Canadians reply their telephones whereas driving “as a result of of household obligations that require fixed consideration.”

    Whereas the OPP recorded 83 inattentive driving deaths in 2017, Solway says many drivers nonetheless “merely do not wish to miss one thing necessary” when their telephones ring.




    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    four − 4 =